- June 12, 2017
- 1493 Views
Ten things I learned at The Future of Finance Summit in Singapore
By Keith Furst
Keith Furst, founder and financial crimes technology expert of Data Derivatives, shares his insights from The Future of Finance Summit 2017 held in Singapore from 8th to 9th June.
- Fintech is so broad and all encompassing that we lose sight of the gravity of the digital transformation happening before our eyes by not understanding it more deeply
- Regulators should not wait too long to update the rules and need to ensure the rules they do impose don't stifle innovation
- Cyber attacks are likely to increase in the future and we will probably start seeing impacts on the physical world and critical infrastructure
Don’t say the F word.
No not that word. Fintech. The founder of The Asian Banker, Emmanuel Daniel, drove this point home by holding up a jar during his opening speech on the first day of the event, demanding a person pay S$1 each time they said the f word.
The point he was making is that we have come to use fintech so loosely that it has lost its meaning. Fintech is short for financial technology and it’s so broad and all encompassing that we, especially in financial services, lose sight of the gravity of the digital transformation happening before our eyes by not understanding it more deeply.
He stressed the new power of the consumer demanding friction-less financial services in many different verticals including payments, lending and investing. He left the audience with a somber warning that the banks that become leaders in the digital economy will survive and the ones that don’t will die within the next 20 years.
Fintech could lead to a decrease in systemic risk, at least in the beginning
Barney Frank predicted that the innovations coming out of fintech will likely lead to regulatory frameworks more focused on consumer protection as opposed to rules addressing systemic risk.
Frank argued that peer-to-peer (P2P) lending could create regulatory concerns of due diligence and consumer protection, but it wouldn’t pose the type of systemic risk created by mortgage-backed securities from the 2007-2008 financial crisis. Then again will we see derivatives spin out from these P2P lending platforms?
The regulatory tug of war could get worse
The fight between national and state regulators in the US could heat up as Trump finishes appointing financial regulators.
Being a regulator is a tough job, but somebody's got to do it
Regulators should not wait too long to update the rules and need to ensure the rules they do impose don't stifle innovation.
If you work in operations, you may want to take a few online courses to learn some new skills
Blockchain has the potential to reduce middle and back office costs by $20 billion or more. A good portion of these costs can be attributed to salaries.
The future of cyber attacks is about to get worse
Cyber attacks are likely to increase in the future and we will probably start seeing impacts on the physical world and critical infrastructure. Wannacry was just the tip of the iceberg.
Even Somali pirates are innovating, are you?
Less sophisticated criminals can partner with hackers to reduce risk and increase profits from physical robberies. This was illustrated by Somali pirates partnering with a hacker who was able to breach a content management system (CMS) and identify high value items on vessels in specific shipping containers.
Incidence response plans must be real
It’s not enough to simply have a nice slide deck describing what would be done when something goes wrong. Each step needs to be carefully planned, but also rehearsed. For example, does an organisation has an ability to press a button and get a phone call and text message out to all their employees that the incidence response plan has been activated? If, company laptops are quarantined due to a malware incident, does the organisation has a backup site they can get up and run in a matter of hours?
Artificial intelligence is even coming for lawyers!
I had the honour of being on the Cybersecurity Thinking Global, Acting Local panel after Professor Marco Gercke gave his presentation on “The Future of Banking – Between the Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and the Challenges of Cyber Threats.”
Gercke described an experiment he participated in where lawyers were put in a room and asked to negotiate a contract within 12 hours and provide a price for it. After the experiment, they were informed that the an AI machine was asked to do the same task. Remarkably, when the two contracts were compared they were almost identical, except for one clause.
A law firm was hired to determine which contract was better and it took them two weeks to figure out the AI produced the better contract. Why? Because the lawyers didn’t know that the clause they included in their version was contested in two small jurisdictions, which is why the AI changed it.
He ended by mentioning that the fundamental issue with the real world applications of AI is trust. Can I trust what the machine is telling me?
Estonia is a global leader in digital government
Still confused about blockchain? Estonia has used a technology that has propelled it to global leadership in digital government. While this system would have serious hurdles to overcome in large and complex jurisdictions such as the US, it does provide some interesting food for thought. How much money do governments waste on inefficient and outdated processes?
Keith Furst is founder and financial crimes technology expert of Data Derivatives. The views expressed herein are strictly of the authors.Categories: Financial Technology, Innovation, Opinions, P2P, Regulation, Technology & Operations
Keywords: The FoF Summit, P2P, systemic risk, innovation, technology, fintech, cybersecurity