CPSS-IOSCO issue disclosure framework and assessment methodology for PFMIs
Date: Dec 20, 2012
Categories: Risk and Regulation
Keywords: CPSS, IOSCO
December 14th 2012 – The Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) have today published a disclosure framework and assessment methodology for their Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMIs), the new international standards for financial market infrastructures (FMIs).
· The disclosure framework is intended to promote consistent and comprehensive public disclosure by FMIs in line with the requirements of the PFMIs.
· The assessment methodology provides guidance for monitoring and assessing observance with the PFMIs.
Both the disclosure framework and the assessment methodology facilitate greater transparency, objectivity and comparability of assessments of observance of the PFMIs and support consistent implementation and application of the PFMIs.
The disclosure framework and assessment methodology were issued for public consultation in April as two separate documents. The final versions being issued now as Principles for financial market infrastructures: disclosure framework and assessment methodology have been revised in light of the comments received during that. Given that disclosure and assessment are closely related, the CPSS and IOSCO have revised the disclosure framework so that it more closely mirrors the assessment methodology and combined the two documents into one for the final versions. This is also in line with comments received during the consultation.
The disclosure framework will be used by an FMI to provide transparency about its activities, risk profile and risk management practices and will thus support sound decision-making by FMIs and their stakeholders. The assessment methodology is primarily intended for use by external assessors at the international level, in particular the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. It also provides a baseline for national authorities to assess observance of the principles by the FMIs under their oversight or supervision and to self-assess the way they discharge their own responsibilities as regulators, supervisors, and overseers. The assessment methodology may also serve as a useful tool for an FMI when, for example, carrying out self-assessments of its observance of the PFMIs or deciding whether the introduction of new services would hamper its ability to observe the PFMIs.
Re-disseminated by The Asian Banker